Item type |
学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) |
公開日 |
2022-07-13 |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Translation, reliability, and validity of Japanese version of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Translation, reliability, and validity of Japanese version of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale |
|
言語 |
en |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
著者 |
櫻本, 秀明
鳩崎, 千絵
卯野木, 健
相川, 玄
小林, 俊介
岡本, 菜子
下村, 真一
川崎, 紋子
福井, 美和子
|
抄録 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Abstract |
|
内容記述 |
Dyspnea is a common, distressing symptom of cardiopulmonary and neuromuscular diseases and is defined as “a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations that vary in intensity.” However, Japanese intensive care units (ICUs) do not routinely screen for dyspnea, as no validated Japanese version of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (RDOS) is available. Therefore, we aimed to translate the English version of this questionnaire into Japanese and assess its validity and reliability. To translate the RDOS, we conducted a prospective observational study in a 12-bed ICU of a universal hospital that included 42 healthcare professionals, 10 expert panels, and 128 ventilated patients. The English version was translated into Japanese, and several cross-sectional web-based questionnaires were administered to the healthcare professionals. After completing the translation process, a validity and reliability evaluation was performed in the ventilated patients. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficient. Criterion validity was ascertained based on the correlation between RDOS and the dyspnea visual analog scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the ability of the RDOS to identify patients with self-reported dyspnea. The average content validity index at the scale level was 0.95. Data from the 128 patients were collected and analyzed. Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficient and the correlation coefficient between the two scales were 0.76 and 0.443 (95% confidence intervals 0.70–0.82 and 0.23–0.62), respectively. For predicting self-reported dyspnea, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.67–0.97). The optimal cutoff used was 1, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.89 and 0.61, respectively. Our findings indicated that the Japanese version of the RDOS is acceptable for face validity, understandability, criterion validity, and inter-rater reliability in lightly sedated mechanically ventilated patients, indicating its clinical utility. |
書誌情報 |
PLoS ONE
en : PLoS ONE
巻 16,
号 8,
p. e0255991,
発行日 2021
|
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
Public Library of Science |
ISSN |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
19326203 |
DOI |
|
|
関連タイプ |
isIdenticalTo |
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255991 |
権利 |
|
|
権利情報 |
© 2021 Sakuramoto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
関連サイト |
|
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255991 |
|
|
関連名称 |
PLoS ONE |
他の資源との関係 |
|
|
|
関連名称 |
isIdenticalTo:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255991 |
フォーマット |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
application/pdf |
著者版フラグ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |